Professional Misconduct Cases
& Grievance Defense
The
Bennett Law Firm is the largest law firm in Texas that specializes
in representing members of the legal profession in grievance matters
and other professional concerns. Robert Bennett has represented lawyers before the Grievance
or “Just Cause” in every part of the state in the last ten (10)
years. Depending on the
allegations brought by the State Bar Commission, he has generally
been able to meet the expectations of his clients and negotiated a
resolution that is acceptable.
The
Firm takes an aggressive posture in handling grievance complaints.
The Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the
Commission For Lawyer Discipline is not seen as a “Friend” of
the Attorney who has been charged with the hope that a resolution
can be quickly reached. The
Bar’s Disciplinary Counsel generally has the goal of punishing the
attorney charged and may ultimately seek disbarment for the acts the
attorney committed.
New Texas Rules
of Disciplinary Procedure went into effect January 1, 2004,
completely changing handling of grievances. See articles below for
more information.
Our
Firm approaches the defense of a grievance in the same manner that a
criminal defense attorney would the citizen accused.
The biggest difference that must be understood is that in the
criminal arena the accused had the presumption of innocence, but in
the grievance process the complaint is considered true as filed and
accepted as a complaint so the burden is on the attorney to prove
that he did not commit professional misconduct.
It is paramount to the attorney accused in the grievance
process to keep this “Burden of Proof” in mind.
When you appear before the Grievance Committee, it is
presumed that what your client has said about you is true and you
have to prove it is not or provide a believable reason why you have
not committed profession misconduct.
The
Firm’s website, www.bennettlawfirm.com
has an extensive listing of professional articles that may help with
your specific problem or concern.
You may wish to seek and advisory opinion from the Firm or
former General Counsel of the State Bar of Texas, Steve Peterson.
If you have to file a response to a complaint, it is always a
good idea to have an attorney with professional liability experience
to review your response. Numerous
other services offered by the Firm are provided on the website.
The
Texas Board Of Law Examiners has responsibility for all law students
wanting to take the Texas Bar Exam and non-Texas attorney who want
to practice in Texas. The
Firm has experience in preparing applications to the BOLE and
representing applicants before this administrative body.
Financial responsibility and prior criminal charges make up
the bulk of the problem areas with BOLE applicants.
When
an attorney has a substance abuse or metal problem that has affected
his practice, consideration should be given to the disability
hearing procedure. This
process is connected with the disciplinary process and should be
used when appropriate.
Please
remember that we all know what kind of attorney it is that provides
his own counsel. Don’t
be one and seek help before it become necessary.
Matters before the Texas Board of Law Examiners
(BOLE) client interview.
Grievance Contract:
Attorney Retainer Agreement for Grievance Matters.
Firm Introductory Letter
regarding Employment Agreement
for Grievance Matters
Should
the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel Enter the Enron Mess?
By Robert. S. Bennett and John Gillies (PDF 194 KB)
Criminal
Exposure from Dealings with Enron. By Robert S. Bennett and Joy
Anderson (PDF 214 KB)
The
People of the State of New York v. Belnick. Tyco Grand
Jury Indictment for Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (PDF
104 KB)
Enron
- Code of Ethics (PDF 3.9 MB)
Professional
Responsibility: Understanding the Grievance Process - How to avoid it and
other current issues ADVANCED BUSINESS LITIGATION University of
Houston Law Foundation August 15-16, 2002 – Houston, Texas AUGUST 22-23
– DALLAS, TEXAS
BOLE Doesn't Appreciate Haste or a Bad Memory, by
Robert S. Bennett and Rene E. Moeller
(Reprinted from Texas Lawyer, May 2002)
( HTML version - 18 kb )
( PDF version - 4mb)
Just what is Barratry, anyways? A Quiz for the Unwary. by Ruth A Kollman and Robert S. Bennett.
A
DEBATE OVER HOW LAWYERS HAVE TO OPERATE,
with Robert S. Bennett, et al.
(reprinted from Texas Lawyer, July 24, 2000)
The “Grief-ance” System and What You Should Know,
by Robert S. Bennett
Is the Fox Guarding the
Chicken Coop? by Robert S. Bennett, Elaine M. Adams and Thomas W.
Houghton (reprinted from Texas
Lawyer, July 29 1996.
( HTML version - 26
KB ) (PDF
version - 9.8 MB)
You've Got a
Grievance, Now What? Steve Peterson, Seminar November 2004
Grievance Forms
Part A
Part B
Part C
Part D
A Common Sense
Proposal For Multi-Jurisdictional Practice
Check
for updates and modifications at:
www.acca.com/advocacy/mjp/commonsenseproposal.html
Professional
Responsibility Related Websites
ABA's World Wide
Web Home Page
Center for
Professional Responsibility
Cornell Law School Legal Ethics Library
Cyberlawyers:
Impact of the Internet on Law Practice and Legal Ethics - James M.
McCauley, Ethics Counsel, Virginia State Bar
David Hricik's Ethics and Risk Management Page
Ethics and Lawyering - W. Freivogel and L. Pera
Freivogel on Conflicts
Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics
John Dzienkowski, Brad Wendel, and John Steele
Katsuey's Legal Gateway - Ethics Legal Directory
Legal
Ethics Forum - John Steele
Legal Ethics Opinion Summaries
Legalethics.com - David Hricik and Peter Krakaur
LegalEthicsBlog - Ben Cowgill
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) Ethics Opinions
National
Organization of Bar Counsel
Net Law
Blog: Internet Tools for Lawyers - Jerry Lawson, Esq. Wash. DC
sunEthics
- Tim Chinaris
The Findlaw Page for Professional Responsibility
Washburn University School of Law
|